| 'Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of
the Crystal Skull'
reviewed by Donna Scott
Any
film directed by Steven Spielberg, with a screenplay co-written
by George Lucas would surely have enough Hollywood glitz about
it to make it not just the blockbuster film for this summer,
but arguably a contender for the decade. Factor in those two
magical words ‘Indiana’ and ‘Jones’,
and all bets are surely off. Spielberg and Lucas’s previous
collaborations under this franchise have given us three of
the biggest films of the eighties, still ranked in the top
150 biggest grossing box-office sales of all time (source
IMDB).
I cannot recall any film being as hotly anticipated in recent
years: the showing I went to see was sold out, but I managed
to grab one of the few remaining tickets for the showing after
that. A chap sitting next to me likened the buzz to when Star
Wars came out: ‘You know, the first one,’
he qualified. I hoped he meant Episode IV, since a comparison
with The Phantom Menace would not have augured well
for the film in my book. Now who wrote that, again…?
The only reservations I had heard about the film prior to
its release concerned Harrison Ford’s ability to step
back into the all-action hero’s desert boots, when someone
of his age might more believably don a pair of comfy slippers.
True, Ford is sixty-five, and nineteen years have indeed passed
since he last played the intrepid archaeologist, but I was
optimistic: I recalled that Ford had insisted on doing a lot
of his own stunts for the first three films and rather suspected
that he was probably still fit enough to keep the action convincing…
and Hollywood magic would help make the rest plausible. Besides,
I was keen to see what a more mature Indy would be like, and
how his world would have changed.
And how it has changed. When we last met Indy, World War II
was still raging and the baddies were the Nazis. Now, it is
1957 and the major threat to world peace comes from the Cold
War between the West and the Soviet Union. So of course the
baddies are now the Russians. Our hero finds himself embroiled
in a Soviet plot to recover extra-terrestrial remains from
Area 51, and must pit himself against the vaguely psychic
KGB colonel, Irina Spalko (Cate Blanchett), who is searching
for secrets that will empower the Soviet Union to crush the
West.
Indy manages to evade the Russians, only to find himself
trapped in a model town in the middle of the desert, just
as the siren sounds for a nuclear test near the site. An ingenious
and fantastical escape later (with the help of a lead-lined
fridge), Indy returns home to reprise his relatively mundane
teaching post in Marshall College – except that the
board have heard how he has been under FBI investigation due
to his association with a Soviet agent, George ‘Mac’
Machale (Ray Winstone), and have pressured the dean, Charles
Stanforth (Jim Broadbent), into firing him. Stanforth has
managed to persuade them to give Indy a leave of absence instead,
but Indy is about to leave town when he is approached by a
young man called Mutt (Shia LaBeouf).
Mutt reveals himself to be the son of Indy’s old flame
Marion Ravenwood (a character first seen in Indiana Jones
and the Raiders of the Lost Ark, played once more by
Karen Allen), who has gone looking for Indy’s old colleague,
John Oxley (John Hurt), who has disappeared while looking
for a crystal skull. Marion has sent her son instructions
to find Indy, so, together they follow the trail to Peru.
The Kingdom of the Crystal Skull offers us pure adventure
in the vein that we have come to know and expect from the
franchise. All the usual props and plot devices are there,
from the instantly recognisable silhouette of Indy in his
fedora to his inventive and skilful use of the bullwhip, and
from the fight scenes that take place on moving vehicles to
the obligatory scenes with deadly beasties. In using these,
Spielberg does more than give a nod to the previous films,
he firmly fixes a framework within which he attempts to give
the cinemagoers what they expect, plus a little more.
What we get is an adventure hero whose moral convictions seem
to be a little less grey than they once were. He may formerly
have been a materialist, grabbing ancient artefacts for their
monetary value, hooked on the adventure, cocky about his ability
to get past booby traps, but his adventures have shown him
the darker side of humanity, and that supernatural forces
exist, and he has learned – and saved the world from
the Nazis. Twice.
When we left Indiana in The Last Crusade, he had
also just learned how to get along with his father. We join
him in The Kingdom of the Crystal Skull just as Jones
Sr. has passed away, and when familial relationships are more
important to him than ever. Cue Mutt Williams.
It is no real surprise that Mutt turns out to be Indy’s
son. First of all, there’s the clue in the name (Indiana
named himself after the dog, after all). But from LaBeouf’s
first appearance on screen, riding a motorbike, dressed like
a young Marlon Brando, he comes across as a young man trying
on a persona, and gets to mimic others throughout the film,
at one point, swinging on jungle vines like Tarzan –
but he doesn’t get to try on Indy’s hat, so it’s
made clear that he is not taking over Indy’s role: there
is only one Indiana Jones.
LaBeouf’s presence in this film is one of its strengths.
Mutt is crucial for anchoring the film to the 1950s, with
his contemporary teenager’s style, challenging Indy
for being out of step with the times. He is a foil to Indiana,
challenging the older man to prove himself time and time again.
LaBeouf’s involvement enables us to see that Ford is
still very capable of taking part in high-adrenalin action
scenes, taking some of the pressure off the older actor at
the same time.

The Making of…promotional documentary, recently screened
on ITV, suggested that Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of
the Crystal Skull would evoke the political climate of
1950s USA: the fear engendered by McCarthyism; the struggles
against racial segregation, but blink and you miss that. Marshall
College could be in Hill Valley, so reminiscent is the neat
and tidy set of that from Back to the Future (which
might perhaps be a deliberate trick to invoke the nostalgia
for pulp fiction that Back to the Future also employs).
True, Indy almost loses his job thanks to McCarthyism, but there
is no sense of witch-hunt, no suffering. All the negativity
is targeted against the Russians.
Sergei Malinkovich of the St Petersburg Communist Party has
criticised the depiction of the Russians in the film and said
it distorts history: "It's rubbish... In 1957 the communists
did not run with crystal skulls throughout the US." (Source:
BBC Online). Some reviewers have also been unconvinced by the
Russians yearning for supernatural powers in the film, not persuaded
that Nazis and Communists can be swapped so easily. Although
Hitler’s interest in the occult has been much documented,
there have been some recent scholarly publications concerning
Stalin’s interest as well. However, the denouement of
the film should demonstrate that Spielberg was not suggesting
that the story was totally realistic.
And herein, for me, lies the film’s main problem. I
loved the introduction of Mutt and the reappearance of Marion.
I even liked Hurt’s performance as the babbling madman,
Oxley, which other reviewers have dismissed as a waste of
Hurt’s abilities. Cate Blanchett may also be underused
here, but at least she looks good. However, the ending was
so big and so implausible that it left me ultimately disappointed,
and I feel that if it weren’t for that, I would not
have come out of the cinema picking the film apart in my head
and wondering why it didn’t seem to be as clever as
some of its predecessors. Without revealing what happens,
I will just say that the end of the film employs a staggering
amount of CGI.
Originally, the series was meant to comprise a total of six
films. I cannot see another film being made, given Ford’s
age and given the fact that Indiana’s family story now
seems quite complete, but if it does happen, I hope that Shia
LaBeouf gets to play Mutt again. Some reviewers have said that
the franchise should have ended with The Last Crusade,
a film of which I am particularly fond, but I would not go that
far; this is a very enjoyable movie in spite of the silly ending:
an action-packed escapist fantasy. But then, we’d expect
nothing less. |